Candidacy

Am I a candidate?

Surgery is the wrong first move for a meaningful share of the people who ask about it. Working out which group you are in is the entire purpose of an examination.

Good signs

What makes someone a strong candidate

A stable pattern

Loss that has slowed or plateaued, so the eventual pattern can be predicted and designed around.

Dense, coarse donor hair

High follicular density with multiple hairs per unit in the occipital and lateral scalp.

Realistic expectations

Understanding that a transplant redistributes existing hair rather than creating new hair.

Defined loss

A clear pattern with healthy surrounding tissue, rather than diffuse thinning everywhere.

Good general health

Nothing that materially impairs healing or makes minor surgery unsafe.

Willingness to maintain

Accepting that native hair still needs a medical plan alongside surgery.

Reasons to wait, or not to operate

The honest list

Loss that is still moving quickly. The most common reason we recommend waiting. Operating into an actively receding pattern produces a result that looks worse in five years than no surgery would have.

A donor zone that is thinning too. This caps what is safely possible, and it matters far more than how large the bald area is. Diffuse unpatterned alopecia is a specific contraindication.

Active scalp disease. Scarring alopecias and autoimmune conditions such as alopecia areata can destroy or reject grafts. These need diagnosis and control first.

Untreated systemic causes. Iron deficiency, thyroid disease and medication effects should be excluded before anyone reaches for a punch.

Expectations that cannot be met. If what you want is the density you had at twenty, no honest surgeon can deliver it, and the conversation should end there rather than at a deposit.

Private consultation and examination room

Straight answers

Questions

Insufficient or unstable donor supply, diffuse unpatterned loss, active scarring or autoimmune alopecia, uncontrolled medical conditions affecting healing, bleeding disorders, and expectations that cannot be met. Very young age is a relative contraindication because the pattern has not declared itself.

Under twenty-five is the genuine risk. Loss is still moving, the eventual pattern is unknown, and grafts placed into it can strand you with an island of hair. Medical stabilisation first, surgery later, is usually the better sequence.

Rarely. Older patients often make better candidates because the pattern has stabilised, which makes a hairline that still looks right in twenty years much easier to design. General health and healing matter more than age.

Sources: NIH / PubMed Central · American Academy of Dermatology · ISHRS Consumer Advocacy

Keep reading

Risks The donor area The Norwood scale Medication

Find out in two minutes, then confirm it in person.

The assessment will tell you if surgery looks premature — and that is a useful answer, not a wasted one.

Start the assessment Book a consultation